1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 BMW 650
To start off, 2010 BMW 650 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 650 (360 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 650 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2010 BMW 650.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 650. (488 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 650.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2010 BMW 650 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 62 | 650 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 488 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4831 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2779 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |