1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pathfinder. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pathfinder.
Because 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |