1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 BMW X3
To start off, 2011 BMW X3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW X3 (240 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2011 BMW X3.
Because 2011 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 BMW X3. (299 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2011 BMW X3 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 62 | X3 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 299 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4648 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1661 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 67 L |