1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Ford F-450
To start off, 2011 Ford F-450 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-450 (399 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Because 2011 Ford F-450 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-450 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-450 (1,085 Nm) has 503 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac 62. (582 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Ford F-450 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | F-450 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 6700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 399 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 1085 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 6680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2024 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 4379 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 142 L |
