1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz G (207 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz G should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mercedes-Benz G. (540 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mercedes-Benz G.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Mercedes-Benz G | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | G |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 540 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4686 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 96 L |