1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet
To start off, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Because 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet. (336 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Murano CrossCabriolet |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 336 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1681 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 82 L |