1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (113 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (270 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |
