1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 945 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 422 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | 62 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 160 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |