1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1943 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Biarritz | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1943 |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3260 mm |
