1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1963 Lancia Fulvia
To start off, 1963 Lancia Fulvia is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1963 Lancia Fulvia.
Because 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Lancia Fulvia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 1963 Lancia Fulvia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
| Model | Biarritz | Fulvia |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2340 mm |
