1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1983 Lada 2105
To start off, 1983 Lada 2105 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1983 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1983 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1983 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 1983 Lada 2105 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | Biarritz | 2105 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2430 mm |