1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1987 Lada Samara

To start off, 1987 Lada Samara is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac Biarritz 1987 Lada Samara
Make Cadillac Lada
Model Biarritz Samara
Year Released 1962 1987
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6388 cc 1100 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 197 HP 52 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 76 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 60.6 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 925 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4010 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 43 L