1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 386 kg more than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280. (270 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 1993 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Biarritz | 280 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 270 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 73.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1794 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |