1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1993 Opel Omega
To start off, 1993 Opel Omega is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1993 Opel Omega. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1993 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Opel Omega. (220 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 1993 Opel Omega | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | Biarritz | Omega |
Year Released | 1962 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 69 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |