1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1997 Mazda 626
To start off, 1997 Mazda 626 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1997 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 975 kg more than 1997 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda 626. (151 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 1997 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Biarritz | 626 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
