1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Biarritz | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2580 mm |