1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 857 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (582 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Biarritz | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 380 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 610 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 106 mm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1323 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5290 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 95 L |
