1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2004 Proton Impian

To start off, 2004 Proton Impian is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2004 Proton Impian. (101 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Impian. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 975 kg more than 2004 Proton Impian. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Proton Impian, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 442 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Impian. (140 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Impian.

Compare all specifications: