1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 752 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Biarritz | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 211 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 61 L |