1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2008 Volvo XC90. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo XC90.
Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo XC90. (400 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Biarritz | XC90 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 400 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 93.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |