1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2009 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (582 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 2009 Cadillac STS-V | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | Biarritz | STS-V |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 469 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 595 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |
