1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC70 (217 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 300 kg more than 2012 Volvo XC70.
Because 2012 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo XC70. (440 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo XC70.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Biarritz | XC70 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 440 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |