1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1962 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 455 kg more than 1947 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |
