1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1962 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 847 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | DeVille | XK |
Year Released | 1962 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 63 L |