1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1960 Alfa Romeo 2000
To start off, 1962 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Alfa Romeo 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Alfa Romeo 2000 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1960 Alfa Romeo 2000. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1960 Alfa Romeo 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 805 kg more than 1960 Alfa Romeo 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Alfa Romeo 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Alfa Romeo 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1960 Alfa Romeo 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | DeVille | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 106 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1337 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 71 L |
