1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | DeVille | Munga |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 43 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 31 L |
