1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1966 Ford Corsair
To start off, 1966 Ford Corsair is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1966 Ford Corsair. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Corsair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1257 kg more than 1966 Ford Corsair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Corsair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Corsair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1966 Ford Corsair | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | Corsair |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |
