1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1967 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1967 Ford GT 40 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1144 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Because 1967 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1967 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 350 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 998 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 125 L |
