1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1969 Vauxhall Viscount

To start off, 1969 Vauxhall Viscount is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 765 kg more than 1969 Vauxhall Viscount.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac DeVille 1969 Vauxhall Viscount
Make Cadillac Vauxhall
Model DeVille Viscount
Year Released 1962 1969
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6389 cc 2651 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2085 kg 1320 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2740 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]