1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1979 Volvo 260
To start off, 1979 Volvo 260 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 260. (146 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 792 kg more than 1979 Volvo 260. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1979 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | 260 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 146 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1720 mm |
