1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1985 Hyundai Pony
To start off, 1985 Hyundai Pony is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1985 Hyundai Pony. (66 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1985 Hyundai Pony. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1195 kg more than 1985 Hyundai Pony. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Hyundai Pony, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (590 Nm) has 494 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Hyundai Pony. (96 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Hyundai Pony.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1985 Hyundai Pony | |
Make | Cadillac | Hyundai |
Model | DeVille | Pony |
Year Released | 1962 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 66 HP |
Torque | 590 Nm | 96 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2390 mm |