1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1992 Mazda Eunos
To start off, 1992 Mazda Eunos is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda Eunos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 855 kg more than 1992 Mazda Eunos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda Eunos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (590 Nm) has 423 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (167 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda Eunos.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1992 Mazda Eunos | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | Eunos |
Year Released | 1962 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 590 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |