1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1993 Volvo 960
To start off, 1993 Volvo 960 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1993 Volvo 960. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1993 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 612 kg more than 1993 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1993 Volvo 960 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | 960 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1750 mm |
