1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1067 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Proton 400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | DeVille | 400 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1466 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1700 mm |
