1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1435 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | DeVille | Smart |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1460 mm |
