1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1999 Ford Ka
To start off, 1999 Ford Ka is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1999 Ford Ka. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1262 kg more than 1999 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 1999 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | Ka |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 40 L |
