1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 934 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 128 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1208 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 132 L |
