1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Musso is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2000 SsangYong Musso. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 312 kg more than 2000 SsangYong Musso. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
| Model | DeVille | Musso |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 73 L |
