1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (142 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 477 kg more than 2001 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2001 Opel Omega | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | DeVille | Omega |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 142 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 75 L |