1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2002 BMW Z3. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 827 kg more than 2002 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | BMW |
| Model | DeVille | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 190 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1315 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 51 L |
