1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Daewoo Kalos

To start off, 2002 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (92 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1040 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (590 Nm) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (130 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Kalos.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Cadillac DeVille 2002 Daewoo Kalos
Make Cadillac Daewoo
Model DeVille Kalos
Year Released 1962 2002
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6389 cc 1399 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 208 HP 92 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 590 Nm 130 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 77.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 73.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2085 kg 1045 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 3890 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 45 L