1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2002 Volvo XC90. (160 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 28 kg more than 2002 Volvo XC90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 160 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 2114 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |
