1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 135 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1162 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | DeVille | Clio |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 73 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |