1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Volvo V70
To start off, 2003 Volvo V70 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V70. (207 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 423 kg more than 2003 Volvo V70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Volvo V70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (590 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo V70. (320 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | V70 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 590 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1662 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |