1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 Lada 111
To start off, 2004 Lada 111 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2004 Lada 111. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2004 Lada 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1035 kg more than 2004 Lada 111. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Lada 111, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (590 Nm) has 474 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lada 111. (116 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lada 111.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 Lada 111 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | DeVille | 111 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 77 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 590 Nm | 116 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 43 L |