1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 555 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (590 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Kia |
| Model | DeVille | K2700 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 2665 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 590 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |
