1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1140 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (590 Nm) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (118 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | DeVille | Polo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1423 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 590 Nm | 118 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 45 L |