1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis (224 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 217 kg more than 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis.
Because 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | DeVille | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 224 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2000 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |