1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2006 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2006 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 42 kg more than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2006 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | DeVille | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 270 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 2184 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |
