1962 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1176 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 2009 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 255 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 15 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 132 L |
